7] when in 2017, Theresa May called for a re-election,
where both the Conservative Party and the Labour Party,
promised within their Manifesto,
to comply with the referendum results, to leave the EU,
there was NO mention of a Deal with the EU, in their Manifesto,s because they knew that they would have lost the election to UKIP,
in addition, their a refusals to comply with their electoral promises, to their voters, constitutes ELECTION FRAUD,
8] Theresa May, was required to have taken advice from
MP Geoffrey Cox, The Attorney General,
on the lawfulness of her Deal,
due to the fact that it was not included within the referendum,
9] prior to attempting to agree a Deal,
of which is in fact a Treaty, with the EU,
Theresa May was required to take lawful advice about it, from
the Attorney General because it is not in compliance
with the referendum result, and it unlawfully locks us into the EU,
this includes the massive costs against the tax payer, of over two years of trying to enforce a fraudulent Deal,
on the UK people,
10] THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE IS REQUIRED,
the Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox, is required by law, to properly advise the Government, of the law,
Theresa May,s Deal, is an 585 page Treaty, of which cannot be enforced without the EXPRESS CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE,
of which Theresa May does not have,
CONSENT is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation of the mind, and the mind weighing, as in balance of good and evil,
it is an act, unclouded by fraud and duress, and
submission is not consent,
consent is an exercise of INTELLIGENCE, based on KNOWLEDGE AND THE UNDERSTANDING of its significance, and there must be
A CHOICE BETWEEN RESISTANCE AND CONSENT,
this is proof, that Theresa May,s Deal/Treaty is a criminal act, because it does NOT, and CANNOT have, CONSENT from the UK most of uk people do not understand the 585 page Deal,
11] the Attorney General, is required to Know,
and Understand the LAW, to enable him to properly undertake
his role, in advising the Government,
the Attorney General is required, to Know and Understand,
that the MPs, and most of the UK people, CANNOT CONSENT
to Theresa May,s 585 page Deal/Treaty with the EU,
in addition, the Attorney General, FURTHER proves himself UNFIT, for his role in advising the government on the law,
due to the fact that recently, in the house of parliament,
he publicly stated to the MPs,
"that the letters attached to Theresa May,s Deal, are in compliance with Good faith, and the EU,
have to lawfully comply with Good Faith",
this wrongful advice, created further votes, in favour of the Deal,
yet NO LAW, can uphold Good Faith, unless it is written into a CONTRACT, and the 585 pages are the contract,
of which has NOT been re-opened,
12] the government cannot overthrow the common law referendum result, voted by the people, of whom have a divine right to uphold their common law rights,
and the Queens pound cannot be used to fund,
Anti-Christian Contracts, to overthrow BREXIT,
13] herein, on this day sunday 17th march 2019, lies my claim against the Conservative and Labour Party, and if they do not uphold the referendum result, to leave the EU, on the 29th of march 2019, they will NO LONGER, be recognised by the people, as a Government that represents the people, and they will have no further rights to any financial funding by the uk people,
or to stand to be elected ever again,
14] 14] the jury will now decide that the government,
ARE GUILTY, IF,
A, IF THEY EXTEND ARTICLE 50, THE GOVERNMENT ARE GUILTY
B, WE HAVE TO LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL,
IF WE DO NOT LEAVE THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL
ON THE 29TH MARCH 2019, THE GOVERNMENT ARE GUILTY,
C] IF THEY DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE UKs RIGHT TO TRADE ON WTO TERMS, THE GOVERNMENT ARE GUILTY,
D] IF THEY BREACH THEIR OATH OF AFFIRMATION,
THEY ARE GUILTY,
TODAY,S DATE IS SATURDAY 30TH MARCH 2019
i, yvonne pears hereby, on this day the 30th of march 2019, hereby, declare that the
Conservative Party and the Labour party,
have been found guilty, by jury, for
A, extending article 50 without lawful excuse,
contrary to common law,
B, refusal to comply with leaving the EU on the
29th march 2019, contrary to common law
C] refusal of compliance with the UKs right, to trade on WTO terms, contrary to common law
D] betrayal, and breach of their
Oath of Affirmation,
of which is required to be in public office,
contrary to common law
SEE PARTICULARS, OF
•BREXIT JUDGMENT•
ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE INDEX
MPs CANNOT REFUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE WITHDRAWAL ACT, TO LEAVE THE EU ON THE 29TH MARCH 2019, BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDER OATH
Refusing to take the OATH
Those elected to the House of Commons, to the Scottish Parliament, or to the Welsh Assembly who refuse to take the oath or affirmation are barred from participating in any proceedings, and from receiving their salaries. Members of the House of Commons could also be fined £500 and, have their seat declared vacant “as if [they] were dead” if they attempt to do so.[12] Under the Parliamentary Oaths Act 1866, any peer voting, or sitting in the House of Lords without having taken the oath, is subject, for every such offence, to a penalty of £500. Members of the Scottish Parliament must take the oath within 2 months of being elected, failing which they cease to be members and their seat is vacated
BREXIT UPDATE
by world renowned lawyer
yvonne pears,
dated 30th september 2019
re; Hilary Benn legislation,
1] the Remainer MPs, have legislated, that the UK cannot leave the EU, Without a Deal,
by Amending the Withdrawal Act,
2] the Withdrawal Act, is already written in concrete, and equally applies to every member state,
it is not open to interpretation, or Amendments, by any member state, whom wish to alter the meaning of it,
3] any Amendment by the UK, of the Withdrawal act, would be required to;
A] to improve it, by changing it for the better, by removing defects or faults,
or
B] to make an amelioration of the withdrawal act, without changing the substance or INTENT of it,
C] an Amendment of the withdrawal act, cannot breach Competition Law,
by detaining a member state within the EU, until a Deal is reached,
this changes the INTENT of the act,
D] the Benn Act, Amends the Withdrawal act, to Detain the UK,
into the Control of the EU,
until the EU decide When, and How,
we can leave,
this Amendment does not improve the withdrawal act,
nor fix any faults within it,
because it creates an Unfair Contract, of which negates itself, it is
NULL AND VOID,
E] the EU withdrawal act,
should never demand that member states, cannot Leave without a Deal, due to the fact that it is in
Breach of the Law of Contracts,
the Benn Act of Parliament, cannot stand under common law, including the fact that the people are sovereign, We the People are
the Electorate, and the Jury,
whom Clearly Directed the government, to get out the EU,
by voting to LEAVE it,
click on individual links below
cocoa interspace international global common law courts of justice
BREXIT PROSECUTION
today,s date is sunday 17th march 2019
lawyer yvonne pears, representing herself, and the 17.4million people whom voted in the referendum to LEAVE THE EU,
Claimants, lawyer, yvonne pears and
17.4 million people, whom voted to leave the EU
Defendants, the UK Conservative Party,
and the UK Labour Party
1] i, yvonne pears, rebuke in the name of Jesus Christ, anyone whomsoever, tries to prevent or deter my rights to freedom,
and my rights to liberty and justice
Just edit this element to add your own HTML.
2] the uk referendum is under the common law jurisdiction,
where the people are the jury, whom have voted to leave the EU,
on the 29th of march 2019, of which stands in law as a judgment,
3] Her Majesty the Queen is the Head of the Church of England,
and she is under Oath to GOD, and GOD,S LAWS,
of which is the COMMON LAW, derived from the Christian Bible,
4] the UK Pound/Sterling, is the Crown Currency, of which is a promise under the Oath of our Queen, to Pay the Bearer,
the oath/contract of the Queen to promise to Pay the Bearer,
is a Christian Contract under Oath to God, under common law, thus proving that our UK currency, is under Christianity,
and GOD,S LAW,
5] when the Queen signed the Article 50 bill into LAW, of which
is common law, she fired a starting gun giving
Royal Assent to leave the EU,
and the European Union 'Notification of Withdrawal Bill'
had received it,s final sign off,
of which was passed by the MPs and Peers, of whom are under Oath to God, Queen, and Country,
6] the Government and the MP,s are the servants, of the people,
of whom accept the Queens pound from the people,
NO government, or MP has any right to overrule, the will of the people, whom are their masters,