www.cocoainterspace.com

​​​​ see proof below of

craig fraser,s Mortgage Books, and

Halifax Bankers Draft Mortgage Payments, 

 to the Coventry Building Society,


*THESE ARE DATED AFTER* the HM Land Registry,

had Unlawfully Removed craig fraser's Mortgage and Property Ownership, from their Registry,, 

the HM Land Registry Data Processed Records below,

Claim that, 

DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE MORROW-BROWN 

is *THE TRANSFEROR/SELLER* 

WHOM HAD RECEIVED PAYMENT OF £65,000*  

FOR CRAIG FRASER'S PROPERTY,

IT ALSO SHOWS RACHEL LAST, AS 

THE DISTRICT JUDGE'S, PURCHASER/TRANSFEREE,


​[a JUDGE CANNOT LAWFULLY ACCEPT PAYMENT,

NOR TRANSFER​ A TITLE, *WITHOUT VACANT POSSESSION*,

AND *REDEMPTION OF THE MORTGAGE* ]


the LAW UPHOLDS THAT, Deputy District Judge Morrow-Brown

is required to SUMMONSand SERVE, CRAIG FRASER,  with a 

NOTICE OF A RIGHT TO A PRE-SEIZURE HEARING,

*Prior To, Accepting Money For His Property*, 

​​​​ see proof below of

HM Land Registry

Money Laundering,


on 27th June 2017,

craig fraser's Registered Title and Mortgage, was unlawfully removed from HM Land Registry, and public records, and changed

into Rachel Last's Sole Name,​​​

a change of Title is a Final Decision,

by an administrative authority, 

without the rights to redress,

of which endeavours to remove safeguards

and rights of redress and appeals,,


craig fraser's property had been acquired

from joint actions between Rachel Last

the HM Land Registry, and the Treasury,

of whom were unjustly enriched 

by the unlawful acquisition, and trespass

upon craig fraser's property,

of which is further proof of Money Laundering,​

[craig fraser had No Knowledge of the

HM Land Registry fraud, until Rachel Last, turned up at his home of 22-years, to notify him, that it is Her House Now, and 
he has 14-days to GET OUT] ​​​



​*the Sale and Purchase of our Private Property, is between ourselves as Private Individuals under PRIVATE LAW*

andclick below individual links

THE HM LAND REGISTRY RECORDED,

THAT DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE MORROW-BROWN,

HAD TRANSFERRED THE TITLE OF CRAIG FRASER,S PROPERTY AFTER RECEIVING £65,000,

IF THIS WAS THE CASE, WHY WASN'T CRAIG FRASER EVER GIVEN NOTICE OF A PR-SEIZURE HEARING,

INCLUDING THE FACT THAT, A JUDGE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO KNOW, THAT AN UNLAWFUL TRANSFER OF PROPERTY,

NULL AND VOIDS ALL OF IT'S INSURANCE,,


​​​a Notice Of Right, Pre-Seizure Hearing, 

So Issued and Served,


shall Notify the Defendant that within 5-days of Service thereof, he may demand such hearing and present such evidence, touching upon the Validity of the

Plaintiffs claim for Immediate Possession,,


if the Defendant fails to make demand for

a Pre-Seizure Hearing, the Constable will be directed

to take Property as described in Affidavit,


a Summons has to be Served on the Defendant for Hearing no more than 20-days later,

the purpose of a Pre-Seizure hearing,

is to allow a claim for Immediate Possession Action

to be Tried, and to Protect Defendants

Use and Possession of Property from

Arbitrary Encroachment, and to prevent Unfair,

or mistaken Deprivation of Property,,


section 22-3-1360 Notice and Opportunity for

Pr-seizure Hearing Required Waiver,


No Property shall be seized under the provisions of

this article, unless five days Notice and

an Opportunity to be Heard, have been afforded,


the party in Possession as herein provided ,


provided however, any person in Possession of the Personal Property, may waive the right to a

Pre-seizure Hearing, if the waiver is Conspicuously Displayed in the Contract and includes the wording,

"Waiver of Hearing prior to Immediate Possession",

in order for contractual waiver to be effective,


the Plaintiff must show by Affidavit,

that the Defendant has, in Writing by Contract,

or Separate Written Instrument, Voluntarily,

Intelligently, and Knowingly, Waived his Right to a Hearing, prior to Repossession of such personal Property,,


the Judge may Order Immediate Delivery of the Property

to the Plaintiff upon Receipt of such Affidavit,,


JUDGE MORROW- BROWN DID NOT CONDUCT A PRE-SEIZURE HEARING, PRIOR TO ACCEPTING PAYMENT OF £65,000 AND ALTERING THE HM LAND REGISTRY RECORDS,


THIS IS PROVEN, due to the fact that

for many months AFTER Judge Morrow-Brown had altered the HM Land Registry Records

the Coventry Building Society continued to accept

craig fraser's Mortgage Payments,

as the Owner Occupier of his Property,


the LAW Protects us, by Ensuring Vacant Possession, and the Redemption of a Mortgage, prior to a change of Title,,​​



*UNLAWFUL PUBLISHING AND

PROCESSING OF DATA*


TITLE, means EVIDENCE of a RIGHT TO POSSESSION, and ACTUAL  OCCUPATION of OUR PROPERTY,


the HM Land Registry PUBLISHED and PROCESSED

FALSE DATA about craig fraser,s Property,

without his knowledge or consent,

whilst he was the SOLE OCCUPIER, of his Property, of which declares him as a Trespasser in his own home,


the HM Land Registry, had continually played for time, by refusing to comply with our complaints, by continually withholding documents, of which they claimed to have relied on, to sell the TITLE of craig fraser,s Property via changing it into the

Sole Name of Rachel Last,


Data is Processed with Consent, and to the extent necessary for purpose,


Data is Not Transferred, without Guaranteed adequate levels of Protection, and Consent,

Processing is required to be under appropriate security measures, with protection from, and against unauthorised or unlawful processing, and against accidental loss, destruction or damage,


we have a lawful right to be informed about the purpose of the processing of our data,

the HM Land Registry did not inform craig fraser of their Data Publishing and Processing of the TITLE DEEDS, to his Personal Property,


on the 27th june 2017 the HM Land Registry changed the TITLE of craig fraser's Property into the Sole name of Rachel Last,

by doing this, the HM Land Registry, created

A PURCHASERS TITLE FOR RACHEL LAST,


this is the DELIVERY of THE BILL OF SALE,

that occurs at the Time and Place fixed by law, or agreed to by the parties,

of which does everything necessary to put Property Completely and Unconditionally,

at the Purchasers Disposal,

by giving POSSESSION,

PRE-SEIZURE HEARINGS

craig fraser was the Sole Occupier and Mortgage Payer,

of his Private Property,

of which was his Home for over 22-Years,

he has NEVER been SERVED, NOR SUMMONED to COURT,

in regard to his Property,

[no Judge shall have cognisance of a Civil Action, when the Title to Real Property shall come into question ]

the HM Land Registry and the Government Treasury,

sold craig fraser a copy of a fraudulent HM Land Registry

Registered Title, about his Private Property,

of which is further Money Laundering,


as the SOLE OCCUPIER of his Property, craig fraser was left with no other alternative, but to pay the

HM Land Registry, for a copy of their Fraudulent

Land Registry Title, of which is recorded on their Public Records,, this was a requirement, to enable himself and his lawyer yvonne pears, to pursue justice, and a claim against them, in case they retrospectively changed their fraudulent records, in order to cover up their crimes, 

see further proof below of

the HM Land Registry Money Laundering,


THERE HAD NEVER BEEN A COURT HEARING 

 REGARDING CRAIG FRASER'S PROPERTY,


yet the HM Land Registry Have Recorded that

A COURT ORDER DATED MAY 2016,

WAS ENFORCED TO TRANSFER CRAIG FRASER'S

PROPERTY IN JUNE 2017 ,,

​*COURT ORDERS TO TRANSFER PROPERTY ARE 

NOT VALID BEYOND 12 MONTHS* 


the HM Land Registry Record below,

INCLUDES 'A COURT CLAIM NUMBER C00CV234'

OF WHICH DOESN'T EXIST 

and alleges that the Transferor/Seller,

RECEIVED £65,000 from the Transferee/Purchaser,, 

IF THE HM LAND REGISTRY RECORDS WERE

TO BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE,, 

THE COURT WOULD HAVE SECURED SOLE POSSESSION,

OF CRAIG FRASER'S PROPERTY, FOR RACHEL LAST,

AND PAID MONEY TO CRAIG FRASER,

PRIOR TO, THEIR CHANGE OF TITLE,

THIS DIDN'T HAPPEN, 


​CHECK BACK SOON, MORE TO COME,